PHP - Manual: Imagick::resizeImage

2024-11-14

Imagick::resizeImage

(PECL imagick 2, PECL imagick 3)

Imagick::resizeImage — Scales an image

说明

public Imagick::resizeImage(
    int $columns,
    int $rows,
    int $filter,
    float $blur,
    bool $bestfit = false,
    bool $legacy = false
): bool

Scales an image to the desired dimensions with a filter.

注意: 参数 bestfit 的特性在 Imagick 3.0.0 中已改变。在此版本以前，当目标尺寸设为 400x400 时，原尺寸为 200x150 的图像将不会被改变。自 Imagick 3.0.0 起，源图像将会被放大到 400x300 因为这将更好的适合目标尺寸。当使用参数 bestfit 时，必须同时给出宽度和高度。

参数

columns: Width of the image
rows: Height of the image
filter: Refer to the list of filter constants.
blur: The blur factor where > 1 is blurry, < 1 is sharp.
bestfit: Optional fit parameter.

返回值

成功时返回 true。

更新日志

版本	说明
PECL imagick 2.1.0	Added optional fit parameter. This method now supports proportional scaling. Pass zero as either parameter for proportional scaling.

范例

示例 #1 Imagick::resizeImage()


<?php
function resizeImage($imagePath, $width, $height, $filterType, $blur, $bestFit, $cropZoom) {
    //The blur factor where > 1 is blurry, < 1 is sharp.
    $imagick = new \Imagick(realpath($imagePath));

    $imagick->resizeImage($width, $height, $filterType, $blur, $bestFit);

    $cropWidth = $imagick->getImageWidth();
    $cropHeight = $imagick->getImageHeight();

    if ($cropZoom) {
        $newWidth = $cropWidth / 2;
        $newHeight = $cropHeight / 2;

        $imagick->cropimage(
            $newWidth,
            $newHeight,
            ($cropWidth - $newWidth) / 2,
            ($cropHeight - $newHeight) / 2
        );

        $imagick->scaleimage(
            $imagick->getImageWidth() * 4,
            $imagick->getImageHeight() * 4
        );
    }


    header("Content-Type: image/jpg");
    echo $imagick->getImageBlob();
}

?>

add a note

User Contributed Notes 7 notes

down

dennis at gofolo dot com ¶

12 years ago


Having to do alot of resizing, i needed to know the speeds of the different resize filters.
This was how long it took to resize a 5906x5906 JPEG image to 1181x1181.

FILTER_POINT took: 0.334532976151 seconds
FILTER_BOX took: 0.777871131897 seconds
FILTER_TRIANGLE took: 1.3695909977 seconds
FILTER_HERMITE took: 1.35866093636 seconds
FILTER_HANNING took: 4.88722896576 seconds
FILTER_HAMMING took: 4.88665103912 seconds
FILTER_BLACKMAN took: 4.89026689529 seconds
FILTER_GAUSSIAN took: 1.93553304672 seconds
FILTER_QUADRATIC took: 1.93322920799 seconds
FILTER_CUBIC took: 2.58396601677 seconds
FILTER_CATROM took: 2.58508896828 seconds
FILTER_MITCHELL took: 2.58368492126 seconds
FILTER_LANCZOS took: 3.74232912064 seconds
FILTER_BESSEL took: 4.03305602074 seconds
FILTER_SINC took: 4.90098690987 seconds 

I ended up choosing CATROM as it has a very similar result to LANCZOS, but is significantly faster.

down

phper at krzysiu dot net ¶

6 years ago


Some size, image and filter and blur combinations causes artifacts or even make image completely scrambled. As far, as I see, it happens with blur values smaller than 0.25 (sometimes less) and goes worse to the point of 0 - black image. Sometimes only some values gives artifacts, like Hanning with my test image: 0.0 blur is fine, 0.1 produces artefacts.

Affected filters are e.g. Catrom, sinc, cubic, quadratic, while unaffected are e.g. Lanczos and Hanning. The problem seems to be the domain of the filter algorithms, not IMagick implementation. This image shows three filters: http://i.imgur.com/HcdwoUS.jpg

Sometimes test image could look fine, but other not, so if you are using affected filters, the 0.5 value should be safe.

This test script takes example image (you can download and use http://i.imgur.com/KsTJpFr.jpg which is affected) and creates resized images in the same directory for every filter and one of four blur values, with naming like "test.jpg.sinc.0.1.jpg" for "test.jpg" input.

<?php
    $imgPath = 'imgtest/test.jpg'; // set your image file
    $testBlurs = [0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5]; // test these blur values
    $im = new IMagick();
    $im->readImage($imgPath);
    
    foreach ((new ReflectionClass('IMagick'))->getConstants() as $n => $f) {
        if (strncmp($n, 'FILTER_', 7) === 0) { // get available IMagick filters
            $filterName = strtolower(substr($n, 7)); // extract filter name from constant
            foreach ($testBlurs as $blur) {
                $imSize = clone $im;
                $imSize->resizeImage(500, 500, $f, $blur, true);
                $imSize->writeImage(sprintf("%s-%s-%.1f.jpg", $imgPath, $filterName, $blur));
                $imSize->destroy();
            }
        }
    }
    
?>

down

andrabr at gmail dot com ¶

14 years ago


blur:  > 1 is blurry, < 1 is sharp

To create a nice thumbnail (LANCZOS is the slowest filter):

<?php

$thumb = new Imagick();
$thumb->readImage('myimage.gif');    $thumb->resizeImage(320,240,Imagick::FILTER_LANCZOS,1);
$thumb->writeImage('mythumb.gif');
$thumb->clear();
$thumb->destroy(); 

?>

Or, a shorter version of the same:

<?php

$thumb = new Imagick('myimage.gif');

$thumb->resizeImage(320,240,Imagick::FILTER_LANCZOS,1);
$thumb->writeImage('mythumb.gif');

$thumb->destroy(); 

?>

down

Spitfires ¶

10 years ago


The changelog comment

  "2.1.0 Added optional fit parameter. This method now supports proportional scaling. Pass zero as either parameter for proportional scaling."

is poorly structured and therefore IMO misleading.  Yes for proportional scaling you pass 0 as either parameter... however this is *not* true if you use the optional fit param.  When bestfit == true you must specify a *non-zero* value for both columns and rows.  Note it WILL still scale proportionally e.g.

   Imagick::resizeImage ( 200, 200,  imagick::FILTER_LANCZOS, 1, TRUE)

will resize a 1000x750 image to 200x150

So for proportional resizing:
without "bestfit"
   Imagick::resizeImage ( 200, 0,  imagick::FILTER_LANCZOS, 1)

with "bestfit"
   Imagick::resizeImage ( 200, 200,  imagick::FILTER_LANCZOS, 1, TRUE)

down

jdhawk at gmail dot com ¶

11 years ago


In our linux environment, using resizeImage with any filter produced extremely high CPU Utilization (in the range of 40-50%) while doing batch resizing.

We switched to scaleImage, which produces similar results to FILTER_BOX, and CPU Utilization dropped to 2-3%. 

Using XHProf to profile the two batch jobs showed amazing decreases in CPU Time, so if you're doing a lot of picture resizing, it might be beneficial to use scaleImage instead of resizeImage, as it seems to be much much more efficient.

down

-21

Spitfires ¶

10 years ago


To avoid upscaling when using the "bestfit" param, check the image dimensions before resizing:

<?php
    $image = new Imagick( $filename );
    $imageprops = $image->getImageGeometry();
    if ($imageprops['width'] <= 200 && $imageprops['height'] <= 200) {
        // don't upscale
    } else {
        $image->resizeImage(200,200, imagick::FILTER_LANCZOS, 0.9, true);
    }
?>

down

-55

michael dot heca at gmail dot com ¶

12 years ago


Use setImageOpacity(1.0) before resizing, for proper handling of transparency in png and gif.

add a note

官方地址：https://www.php.net/manual/en/imagick.resizeimage.php

有任何技术问题请点击这里网站运营推广招聘

IT PHP 编程语言 Linux 开发编程科技 Elasticsearch HTML/CSS/XML 网络 JAVA NoSQL 数据库面试 C/C++ Golang Git 算法操作系统正则表达式 Redis 互联网 MySql JavaScript 运维软件国际架构设计 Mac OS TCP/IP Excel Vim Windows Socket Oracle VR MongoDB Python 运营 MemCache 商业硬件电子娱乐设计 nginx 摄影游戏 WordPress HTTP 团建数码电器

php7 安装fileinfo扩展 preg_split — 通过一个正则表达式分隔字符串 php位值,解决 PHP 中 usort 在值相同时改变原始位置的问题 [PHP] inet_pton/inet_ntop IP地址转换函数 array_multisort() 多字段排序 PHPMailer设置utf8 PHPMailer字符集CharSet ADORecordSet对象 adodb手册 PHP 8.1 [鸟哥]PHP_INT_MIN 和 -9223372036854775808 opcache预加载 Composer的Packagist资源 mysql面试题 [鸟哥]PHP FFI详解 - 一种全新的PHP扩展方式 PHP7添加redis扩展 PHP mkdir()写出来的权限与mode值不符合 Packagist / Composer 中国全量镜像支持php7的性能采集扩展 adodb连接mysql多个数据库的问题 php $_SERVER中的SERVER_NAME 和HTTP_HOST的区别

略微加速

PHP官方手册 - 互联网笔记

Imagick::resizeImage

说明

参数

返回值

更新日志

范例

User Contributed Notes 7 notes